Review: Henri Laurent Brut NV

Henri Laurent is a “Negociant Manipulant” champagne produced by Recoltant (Grower) house Champagne Charpentier of Charly sur Marne, Champagne, for Coles who distribute it throughout Australia.

Via the technicalities of champagne law, a Recoltant House can’t sell champagne made from grapes it hasn’t grown itself. This means a NM coded wine like Henri Laurent is significantly built from grapes that Charpentier has bought from external growers. This is why it has an alternate name; to separate itself from the house’s recoltant wines.

Such commercial arrangements are not uncommon in the Champagne world.

J Charpentier founded his house in 1855, and originally sold wine to boat and cabmen when they pulled in for a pit-stop at his estate. Today, the house is known for the unusal step of growing Chardonnay within the Marne Valley region, where Pinot Meunier is usually the staple.

Henri Laurent Brut NV is cheap offering from the Coles group of liquor retailers, and on sale can be found for $30 a bottle – but don’t let that be a deterrent for questionable quality. Being a product of a house that deeply understands champagne production from soil to bottle is a wise move that could possibly yield some surprising results!

Let find out how it goes.

Champagne Henri Laurent NV
Champagne Henri Laurent NV


From: Charly sur Marne, Champagne, France

Code: NM-575-005

Cost & Source: ~$36 a bottle available from First Choice Liquor

Blend Ratio (%): Pinot Noir/Chardonnay/Pinot Meunier (80/15/5) with 8 g/l dosage

Aging: 3 Years

Disgorged: 2016 (estimated)

Sipped: July 2017

In the Glass:

Look: Henri Laurent has a Pale Golden Hue, with a good fine bead.

Smell: Henri Laurent is a very fresh and fruity smelly wine with a slight trace of yeast from fermentation

Taste: A surprisingly good drop – Henri Laurent arrives with a vibrant introduction of snappy citrus, with a elements of tart pineapple, strawberry caps and cranberry in a reasonable depth of intensity. If anything it tastes slightly watery in delivery, holding itself back a touch.

Once the sip has settled in, tongue real-estate is occupied by a slight fungal aftertaste of medium length with takes a bit of the edge off – but not as bad as others I’ve tried.

Refreshing and pleasant otherwise.


Party Potential: It’s cheap price (especially on sale) and decent performance make it a good budget “Genuine Champagne” that will perform ably if you are not insistent on brand names.

As a Gift: I would only recommend Henri Laurent as an informal gift for casual events, where you get to open it straight away.

At Home: This is a decent Friday night split with the significant other over a carefully prepared, home cooked meal (or special take away).

Matching: I had this champagne with some lovely pork and prawn rice paper rolls and it performed more than admirably.

Score & Verdict:


A mysterious one, hiding its half-blood family lines behind an alter ego. They have absolutely nothing to be ashamed about – pleasant company at the dinner table – and some occasional casual meetings are in order.

At $36 I feel it is only decent value for the quality.

How did I drink it?

Bought a cold bottle for a family members impromptu birthday dinner..

How did you drink it?

And how did you find it? Let me know!

For more reviews like this, click here

3 thoughts on “Review: Henri Laurent Brut NV

  1. Gizoli

    Thank you for the review of this wine. You appear to find it quite respectable and indeed a good value for the price. So why would you score it 5.5 of 10 which is barely a pass or almost a fail. One would think a score of 7 or 7.5 would be more suitable to your comments. For your own credibility you should re-evaluate the way you score or consider leaving out the score all together.


    1. Hi Gizoli,
      My scores aren’t based on price, nor are they a pure 1 to 10 scale.

      If you click on the score you will find I rank on tasting experience provided, and nothing else.

      In this instance, I would say relative to other well known champagnes it does fairly well, although I did state it was only decent value – as its expression is suppressed by a watery delivery and a slightly quashed finish.

      Thanks again!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s